Understanding the Definitions of “Director” and “Officer” Under Public Clarification CTP010
The Federal Tax Authority (FTA) has issued Public Clarification CTP010, providing important guidance on the interpretation of “Connected Persons” under the UAE Corporate Tax Law. The clarification is effective from the implementation date of the Corporate Tax Law and serves as an authoritative interpretation of existing legislation rather than the introduction of a new rule.
The clarification focuses particularly on the meaning of “director” and “officer,” two concepts that are critical in determining whether certain payments made by a taxable person may be deductible for Corporate Tax purposes.
Why This Clarification Matters
Under Article 36 of the UAE Corporate Tax Law, payments or benefits provided by a taxable person to a Connected Person are deductible only to the extent that they:
- Are incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes; and
- Reflect Market Value.
Any excess amount may be disallowed for Corporate Tax purposes, resulting in increased taxable income and potentially higher tax liabilities.
In practice, many businesses have faced uncertainty when assessing who qualifies as a “director” or an “officer.” Job titles alone are not determinative, and organizations must instead evaluate the actual legal position and authority exercised by individuals within the business.
The FTA’s clarification provides much-needed guidance on this issue.
Who Is Considered a “Director”?
According to the FTA, a “director” is an individual who formally holds a position on the board of directors or an equivalent governing body under the entity’s:
- Applicable law;
- Memorandum of association;
- Articles of association;
- Partnership agreement; or
- Trust deed.
The definition extends beyond traditional board members and includes:
- Executive directors;
- Non-executive directors;
- Temporary or permanent directors;
- Alternate directors;
- Members of board committees; and
- Members of equivalent governing bodies such as boards of trustees or governors.
The key factor is the formal appointment to a governing body rather than the individual’s operational responsibilities or title within the organization.
Understanding the Definition of an “Officer”
The concept of an “officer” is broader and more substance-based.
The FTA emphasizes that officer status depends on the actual authority exercised by an individual rather than the title stated in their employment contract or organizational chart.
An individual may be regarded as an “officer” if they satisfy any of the following conditions:
- They have authority and responsibility for planning, directing, and controlling the activities of the business, consistent with the IAS 24 framework;
- They possess authority to make strategic financial, operational, or commercial decisions; or
- They are authorised to enter into agreements or approve actions that legally or contractually bind the business.
Importantly, individuals who merely implement decisions or operate within parameters established by senior management would generally not qualify as officers if they lack ultimate strategic authority.
One of the most significant aspects of the clarification is the FTA’s emphasis on substance over form.
Titles such as:
- “Consultant”
- “Advisor”
- “Head of Department”
- “General Manager”
- “Managing Director”
do not automatically determine whether an individual is an officer.
Instead, businesses must assess the actual level of authority exercised by the individual.
As a result, individuals functioning in senior decision-making roles may qualify as officers even if they are not formally part of the C-suite.
Practical Examples from the FTA
The clarification includes several practical examples illustrating how the rules apply in different scenarios.
Likely to Be Considered an Officer
- A General Manager with overall responsibility for operations and strategy;
- A strategic Head of HR with authority over manpower planning, organizational structure, and key personnel decisions;
- An interim CEO operating under a consultancy arrangement;
- Trustees responsible for directing and controlling the activities of a taxable trust;
- Authorised representatives with discretionary decision-making powers.
Unlikely to Be Considered an Officer
- A Head of HR whose role is limited to payroll administration and routine employee matters;
- Division heads or department managers operating strictly within policies and frameworks established by the board or C-suite;
- Individuals who require approval from senior management before making strategic or binding decisions.
Interaction with Related Party Rules
The clarification also confirms that where an individual qualifies as both a Related Party and a Connected Person, the Related Party provisions take precedence.
Businesses should therefore assess both frameworks carefully when reviewing transactions involving owners, family members, senior executives, and related entities.
Corporate Tax Implications for Businesses
The clarification has significant practical implications for UAE businesses.
- Salaries, bonuses, benefits, management fees, or other payments made to Connected Persons are deductible only to the extent they reflect Market Value.
Excessive remuneration or unsupported payments may be disallowed for Corporate Tax purposes.
- Payments to Connected Persons may need to be disclosed in the Corporate Tax Return where they exceed the FTA’s disclosure thresholds.
Incomplete or inaccurate disclosures could expose businesses to administrative penalties.
- Businesses can no longer rely solely on job titles when assessing tax exposure.
Individuals operating in senior management capacities — including outsourced managers, consultants, seconded employees, or interim executives — may still qualify as officers if they exercise strategic or binding authority.
Final Thoughts
The FTA’s Public Clarification CTP010 provides important practical guidance for businesses navigating the Connected Person provisions under UAE Corporate Tax.
The clarification confirms that businesses must look beyond titles and examine the actual authority exercised by individuals within the organization. This substance-over-form approach increases the importance of governance reviews, remuneration benchmarking, and accurate tax disclosures.
Organizations should proactively review their structures and documentation to ensure compliance and reduce potential Corporate Tax risks.
Disclaimer
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute tax, legal, or professional advice. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, tax laws and interpretations may change over time. Businesses should seek professional advice tailored to their specific circumstances before taking any action based on this information.
Contact Our Tax Team
If you have questions or require assistance regarding UAE Corporate Tax or VAT, our tax professionals are here to help.
Email: [email protected]
[email protected]
Phone: +971 457 52971
+971 454 13206
Website: www.chrysalisserve.com
#corporatetaxuae #uaetax #taxlawuae #taxreturn #taxfiling #corporatetaxregistration #taxfile #taxapplication #freezone #taxrate #ministryoffinance #taxlaw #corporateincometax #conductbusiness #emiratelevel #businessesintheuae #taxableprofits #capitalgains #taxreturn #cumentationrequirements #taxableperson #taxcredits #oecdbaseerosionandprofitshifting #taxableincomeaboveaed375,000 #qualifyingpublicbenefitentity #unitedarabemiratesuae #extractivenaturalresourcebusiness.
Want to set up a business in the UAE? Calculate your business setup cost today!